![]() Width – The original width of Slimfit makes it wider than the 4Ever Extend2fit, yet, if you decide to make use of its slimming feature wherein the cup holders can be rotated to reduce their size in half, you could have an additional space of about one inch that will enable 3-across installation in a vehicle. Not only does it have 2 booster modes (high back booster and backless booster), it can also accommodate up to 120 pounds. These 2 car seats are at par in terms of forward-facing capacity.Ĭonsidering the booster capacity of the 2 Graco products, it is quite obvious that 4Ever Extend2fit is once again a more preferable option. ![]() Just like the classic/original Graco Extend2fit,* it has a 4-position leg extension panel that offers up to 5 inches of legroom for the child passenger. However, in terms of making a child more comfortable, less awkward, and more willing to sit rear-facing on the car seat, 4Ever Extend2fit has a feature that could make this happen. The 40 pounds rear-facing limit of Slimfit may only accommodate a child up to 4 years of age while the 50 pounds rear-facing limit of 4Ever Extend2fit can be used by a child until he/she is 7-8 years old (if based on this table for half of the kids within the ranges). The Slimfit, on the other hand, appears to offer a good fit with babies at least 7 pounds in weight, instead of the 5 pounds that were advertised to be its minimum rear-facing limit.Ĭomparing Graco Slimfit and Graco 4Ever Extend2fit in terms of rear-facing capacity, the latter would be the better choice for any parents as it can allow a child to ride rear-facing for a longer period of time, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. According to reviewers, a 4-pound preemie could have a good fit with the 4Ever Extend2fit. ![]() The minimum rear-facing limit of 4Ever Extend2fit is lower than that of Slimfit (4 pounds vs 5 pounds). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |